Attorney General Administration of industry and Commerce Ali white paper how did the legal effect

Abstract: in fact the Alibaba and the State Administration for Industry and Commerce has long been the "reconciliation", not "turmoil". The prosecution of the prosecution and the right to know Wu Ji and Alibaba do not matter.

 

note: about Alibaba PK SAIC events since the beginning of the update. Titanium media said in an article "the State Administration for Industry and commerce again informed Taobao selling, and respond to Taobao propaganda called" not overinterpret directional monitoring results of "Cai Chongxin" white paper: " " flawed, aimed at Alibaba, sustained progress in tracking events for the complaint "in the State Administration for Industry and commerce. The focus of attention in January 28, 2015, SAIC announced the "on administrative guidance on the Alibaba’s January 30th white paper", later renamed the "white paper" has no legal effect. In this paper, and the State Administration for Industry and Commerce Court lawyer Wu Ji, is from the beginning to pay attention to this point embarked on a long journey "mingaoguan".

days ago, an article entitled "the State Administration for Industry and Commerce for Alibaba refused to open the" white paper on the basis of the event report caused widespread concern. The article said,

State Administration for Industry and Commerce and China e-commerce giant Alibaba "dispute", with a paper case acceptance notice round the Beijing first intermediate court. Lawyer Wu Ji Wen law firm in Beijing, by the State Administration for Industry and Commerce in the event of violations of the right to know the Alibaba, the State Administration for Industry and commerce to court.

But

titanium media reporter learned that in fact the Alibaba and the State Administration for Industry and Commerce has long been the "reconciliation", not "turmoil". According to media reports, the Alibaba and the Administration for Industry and Commerce jointly set up a business online customer service complaints and settlement mechanism, the first phase of the online complaint platform has been completed, as of April this year, Guangdong, Jiangsu, Tianjin and other places have tried consumer complaints platform. Wu Ji said in an interview with titanium media,

SAIC as government administrative departments have the responsibility of supervising the market order. "Alibaba", the State Administration for Industry and commerce should reflect on their own whether effectively assume regulatory responsibility for the market, rather than blindly problem as is the fault of selling businesses. Today, the two sides shook hands and jointly assume responsibility for the regulation of the electricity supplier market order, is a good thing.

"industrial and commercial open word (2015) No. 26" "government information disclosure letter"

Beijing first intermediate people’s court accepted the case notice

and Wu sued SAIC has no relationship with Alibaba, Alibaba has not contacted with the matter. In February of this year, he applied to the State Administration for Industry and commerce to publish the white paper and the legal basis for the release and refused. May 19th, Wu leather because the State Administration for Industry and commerce to infringe upon its right to know to the court proceedings, but the specific time of the hearing has not yet